The Plain-English Question Box
Stakeholders describe what’s broken in their own words. Guided questions extract the problem, the people affected, and a reachable owner—without a Gantt chart or a RACI matrix.
Software project intake
Run Software Projects from Intake to Delivery—Without the PMO Jargon.
You know your business. You don't need a degree in Agile project management to ask your team for a software feature. Precision Foundry translates everyday language into structured development facts automatically.
Not ready for the waitlist? Download the 4-page Anti-PMO Playbook
A complete software project intake replaces
- The translator tax of a dedicated PM in every intake meeting
- Solution-first forms that hide what is actually broken
- Spreadsheets and slide decks prepared for a weekly steering committee
The traditional PMO way versus the Precision Foundry way
Enterprise tools assume you have a certified Agile project manager to maintain them. Software project intake does not. You know your business. No degree, no certification—the person closest to the work should move the request from beginning to end in everyday language.
The Traditional PMO Way
The Precision Foundry Way
Heavy jargon: Gantt charts, RACI matrices, critical paths, and resource utilization charts.
Everyday language: problem statement, people affected, reachable owner, and simple constraints.
The translator tax: a dedicated PM sits in meetings to turn business language into tickets.
The intelligent firewall: guided, plain-language questions extract clear constraints from day one.
Process for process’s sake: hours spent updating spreadsheets and slide decks for a steering committee.
Living evidence records: the original request becomes requirements, testing, and delivery on the same thread.
Everyday language
Symmetric Sizing
Getting the business side and the tech side to agree on the real workload before anyone starts coding. People cost and code cost sit on the same card.
A Frictionless Handoff
Pass clean, pre-validated scope to the people who build. The original request stays on the same thread through requirements, testing, and delivery.
Software project intake fails when the form asks for a solution
Most submission forms collect a title, a deadline, and a requested system. Reviewers then book meetings to recover the problem the form never asked for. Software project intake should make the request complete—not invent the build, and not require a PMO to translate it.
Incomplete submissions
Capture the current situation, the people who feel the pain, a reachable owner, timing windows, and known limits in one request.
Solution-first forms
Ask what is broken and who is affected before the form invites a vendor name, an architecture, or a feature list.
No named requestor
Identify who submitted the request and who can answer follow-up questions while the story is still fresh.
Executing software project intake — no Agile certification required
You know your business. Software project intake does not require a degree in Agile project management. The job is to make the request understandable. Discovery questions, scoring, and delivery sequencing belong later.
- 1
Describe what happens today
Start with the current process, the people involved, and why the existing path is not good enough—in everyday words.
- 2
Name the owner and the constraints
Attach a reachable business owner, known timing windows, vendors that cannot move, and policies that already apply.
- 3
Route the complete request
Give reviewers one submission instead of asking the requestor to repeat the story in email, chat, and a kickoff.
In the product
The Plain-English Question Box
Stakeholders describe what’s broken in their own words. Once the submission is understandable, that request becomes context for the next questions. Intake itself stops at a complete submission.
Results
Software project intake benefits
When software project intake is complete, a stranger to the request can name the problem, the people, the owner, and the hard limits. That is the handoff into questions—not a charter and not a backlog.
- A consistent submission without project-management jargon
- Fewer clarification meetings just to understand the ask
- A named owner for follow-up questions
- A frictionless handoff: the original request stays attached when discovery begins
Common questions
Questions about a complete software request
What is software project intake?+
Software project intake is how an organization collects and reviews a request for new software or a meaningful change. A useful submission explains the current problem, the people affected, a reachable owner, timing, and known constraints. It is not a project plan and it is not a score.
Who should submit a software project request?+
The person closest to the broken process. You know your business. You don't need a degree in Agile project management, a PMO, or project-management vocabulary. A reviewer can add context later. The owner field exists so follow-up questions have a name.
Does software project intake require a solution design?+
No. A complete submission starts with what is happening today and who hurts. Naming a vendor or a feature list too early hides the problem and makes requests incomparable.
What happens after a complete intake submission?+
Reviewers check whether the story can be understood. If it can, the request moves into guided questions. Scoring a portfolio and opening a board are later jobs.
Ditch the PMO jargon and submit one complete software request
The best process is the one that does not need a project manager to translate it. Start with a guided submission—not another intake sync.
Join the private alpha waitlist